<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Power Of Friendfeed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joel-mark-witt.com/blog/2009/the-power-of-friendfeed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joel-mark-witt.com/blog/2009/the-power-of-friendfeed/</link>
	<description>Meaningful Lives Don&#039;t Happen By Accident</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 20:40:42 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: joelmarkwitt</title>
		<link>http://joel-mark-witt.com/blog/2009/the-power-of-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-3272</link>
		<dc:creator>joelmarkwitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joel-mark-witt.com/blog/?p=815#comment-3272</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure you&#039;ve got a point Taylor. The same argument could be made for Twitter followers. They could be seen as &quot;lower quality&quot; - but I just view it as an informal acquaintance that could lead to a deeper relationship in the future.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;~ Joel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m sure you&#39;ve got a point Taylor. The same argument could be made for Twitter followers. They could be seen as &#8220;lower quality&#8221; &#8211; but I just view it as an informal acquaintance that could lead to a deeper relationship in the future.</p>
<p>~ Joel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Davidson</title>
		<link>http://joel-mark-witt.com/blog/2009/the-power-of-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-3271</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joel-mark-witt.com/blog/?p=815#comment-3271</guid>
		<description>RSS subscribers that pay attention are &quot;worth&quot; (meaning, paying attention, making a connection) more than ones than don&#039;t.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have an assumption (which could be very wrong) that a lower % of Friendfeed RSS subscribers pay attention than just regular RSS subscribers.  Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RSS subscribers that pay attention are &#8220;worth&#8221; (meaning, paying attention, making a connection) more than ones than don&#39;t.  </p>
<p>I have an assumption (which could be very wrong) that a lower % of Friendfeed RSS subscribers pay attention than just regular RSS subscribers.  Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joelmarkwitt</title>
		<link>http://joel-mark-witt.com/blog/2009/the-power-of-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-3270</link>
		<dc:creator>joelmarkwitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joel-mark-witt.com/blog/?p=815#comment-3270</guid>
		<description>You are right in asking Taylor. Are some RSS subscribers more valuable than others?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess I wasn&#039;t measuring worth as much as I am noticing the potential of Friendfeed to connect with an audience (however informal) in a new way.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;~ Joel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right in asking Taylor. Are some RSS subscribers more valuable than others?</p>
<p>I guess I wasn&#39;t measuring worth as much as I am noticing the potential of Friendfeed to connect with an audience (however informal) in a new way.</p>
<p>~ Joel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Davidson</title>
		<link>http://joel-mark-witt.com/blog/2009/the-power-of-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-3269</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joel-mark-witt.com/blog/?p=815#comment-3269</guid>
		<description>Actually, it invites a question: is a Friendfeed subscriber &quot;worth&quot; as much as an RSS subscriber, or an Email subscriber, or a person that visits the site directly, or a Twitter follower?  We intuitively know the answer is no, but how can we measure the x multiple of &quot;worth&quot; to each form of content distribution?  There must be some way which I&#039;m overlooking...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Friendfeed used to count as 1 RSS sub, and it changed a couple months ago.  I&#039;m curious if people started trying to get more FF subs purely to boost their RSS sub count :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it invites a question: is a Friendfeed subscriber &#8220;worth&#8221; as much as an RSS subscriber, or an Email subscriber, or a person that visits the site directly, or a Twitter follower?  We intuitively know the answer is no, but how can we measure the x multiple of &#8220;worth&#8221; to each form of content distribution?  There must be some way which I&#39;m overlooking&#8230;</p>
<p>Friendfeed used to count as 1 RSS sub, and it changed a couple months ago.  I&#39;m curious if people started trying to get more FF subs purely to boost their RSS sub count :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
