<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Publisher Or Blogger&#8230; Or Writer? What Do You Call Yourself?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joel-mark-witt.com/blog/2009/publisher-or-blogger-or-writer-what-do-you-call-yourself/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joel-mark-witt.com/blog/2009/publisher-or-blogger-or-writer-what-do-you-call-yourself/</link>
	<description>Meaningful Lives Don&#039;t Happen By Accident</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 20:40:42 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: joelmarkwitt</title>
		<link>http://joel-mark-witt.com/blog/2009/publisher-or-blogger-or-writer-what-do-you-call-yourself/comment-page-1/#comment-3267</link>
		<dc:creator>joelmarkwitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joel-mark-witt.com/blog/?p=773#comment-3267</guid>
		<description>Taylor,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the great thoughts. I like your viewpoint. &quot;Publisher&quot; is a broad term and isn&#039;t tool specific. If we label ourselves by the tools we use - then we are already outdated. For example: I think of so many filmmakers who can&#039;t latch onto internet media simply because of how they&#039;ve labeled themselves.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And you are also right that any good &quot;publisher&quot; will be listening to his/her audience. We ALL need to do that more.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;~Joel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taylor,</p>
<p>Thanks for the great thoughts. I like your viewpoint. &#8220;Publisher&#8221; is a broad term and isn&#39;t tool specific. If we label ourselves by the tools we use &#8211; then we are already outdated. For example: I think of so many filmmakers who can&#39;t latch onto internet media simply because of how they&#39;ve labeled themselves.</p>
<p>And you are also right that any good &#8220;publisher&#8221; will be listening to his/her audience. We ALL need to do that more.</p>
<p>~Joel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Davidson</title>
		<link>http://joel-mark-witt.com/blog/2009/publisher-or-blogger-or-writer-what-do-you-call-yourself/comment-page-1/#comment-3266</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joel-mark-witt.com/blog/?p=773#comment-3266</guid>
		<description>Agreed, terminology and labels are important, it frames how we approach a situation.  Tools matter, right? (loved your notes on twitter about tools, btw) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Personally, I take more of the &quot;publisher&quot; view.  I cringe when I use the word publisher, for the simple reason that it focuses more on talking and neglects the role of listening, the term publisher is a broader, more flexible frame that focuses more on the core of what I enjoy doing (creating, sharing) than the tools I use.  The tools will change far faster than me :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, terminology and labels are important, it frames how we approach a situation.  Tools matter, right? (loved your notes on twitter about tools, btw) </p>
<p>Personally, I take more of the &#8220;publisher&#8221; view.  I cringe when I use the word publisher, for the simple reason that it focuses more on talking and neglects the role of listening, the term publisher is a broader, more flexible frame that focuses more on the core of what I enjoy doing (creating, sharing) than the tools I use.  The tools will change far faster than me :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
