<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Andy Carvin Was Right About Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joel-mark-witt.com/blog/2009/andy-carvin-was-right-about-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joel-mark-witt.com/blog/2009/andy-carvin-was-right-about-twitter/</link>
	<description>Meaningful Lives Don&#039;t Happen By Accident</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 20:40:42 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Davidson</title>
		<link>http://joel-mark-witt.com/blog/2009/andy-carvin-was-right-about-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3113</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joel-mark-witt.com/blog/?p=633#comment-3113</guid>
		<description>The real question, Joel, is what happens when the mainstream is on Twitter: how does our use, perception and intent change? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/02/05/the-future-for-twitter/#comment-6178828&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I doubt&lt;/a&gt; it stays the same...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real question, Joel, is what happens when the mainstream is on Twitter: how does our use, perception and intent change? <a href="http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/02/05/the-future-for-twitter/#comment-6178828" rel="nofollow">I doubt</a> it stays the same&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joelmarkwitt</title>
		<link>http://joel-mark-witt.com/blog/2009/andy-carvin-was-right-about-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3112</link>
		<dc:creator>joelmarkwitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joel-mark-witt.com/blog/?p=633#comment-3112</guid>
		<description>@Carolyn Thanks for the note. I&#039;ve actually been on Twitter for quite a while now. Even back during my &quot;debate&quot; with Andy and others I was a user. I just didn&#039;t see it as a useful tool for marketing and PR in the past. I liked chatting and using it to be social - but not much else.

And I don&#039;t think we should discount the power of blogs to explore information and ideas in a deeper way than what 140 characters can do. So I&#039;m glad you didn&#039;t just tweet your response. Leaving a comment here gave you more space to let your ideas develop further.

And I agree. Following Andy is great to keep up with what is going on with NPR and the news in general. He keeps people very informed.

Joel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Carolyn Thanks for the note. I&#8217;ve actually been on Twitter for quite a while now. Even back during my &#8220;debate&#8221; with Andy and others I was a user. I just didn&#8217;t see it as a useful tool for marketing and PR in the past. I liked chatting and using it to be social &#8211; but not much else.</p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t think we should discount the power of blogs to explore information and ideas in a deeper way than what 140 characters can do. So I&#8217;m glad you didn&#8217;t just tweet your response. Leaving a comment here gave you more space to let your ideas develop further.</p>
<p>And I agree. Following Andy is great to keep up with what is going on with NPR and the news in general. He keeps people very informed.</p>
<p>Joel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carolyn Foote</title>
		<link>http://joel-mark-witt.com/blog/2009/andy-carvin-was-right-about-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3111</link>
		<dc:creator>Carolyn Foote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joel-mark-witt.com/blog/?p=633#comment-3111</guid>
		<description>I, for one, have really found it a cool thing to follow Andy&#039;s twitters about NPR doings.  As a librarian, then I can pick up little tidbits to share with teachers where I work.

Not to mention all the things I learn from fellow twitterers about technology, library what-not, and news in general.

But of course you know that now that you are on twitter :)

So I suppose I should have just twittered my response!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, for one, have really found it a cool thing to follow Andy&#8217;s twitters about NPR doings.  As a librarian, then I can pick up little tidbits to share with teachers where I work.</p>
<p>Not to mention all the things I learn from fellow twitterers about technology, library what-not, and news in general.</p>
<p>But of course you know that now that you are on twitter :)</p>
<p>So I suppose I should have just twittered my response!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Nocera</title>
		<link>http://joel-mark-witt.com/blog/2009/andy-carvin-was-right-about-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3110</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Nocera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joel-mark-witt.com/blog/?p=633#comment-3110</guid>
		<description>You have probably already seen the Pew Research report on Twitter which is now growing like a wildfire on Twitter because Pew provides a snapshot of where Twitter was at the time of their study. (But, not where Twitter is today, or where it will be in 12 more months as what I&#039;ve branded the &quot;the O9&#039;ers&quot; stake their claims on Twitter in search of their share of that &quot;Twitter gold&quot;.

Also, I too monitor the same intersection that you&#039;ve identified - with the key word for me being leadership.

Looking forward to monitoring/sharing information with you as this crucial intersection becomes more and more the focal point for online traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have probably already seen the Pew Research report on Twitter which is now growing like a wildfire on Twitter because Pew provides a snapshot of where Twitter was at the time of their study. (But, not where Twitter is today, or where it will be in 12 more months as what I&#8217;ve branded the &#8220;the O9&#8242;ers&#8221; stake their claims on Twitter in search of their share of that &#8220;Twitter gold&#8221;.</p>
<p>Also, I too monitor the same intersection that you&#8217;ve identified &#8211; with the key word for me being leadership.</p>
<p>Looking forward to monitoring/sharing information with you as this crucial intersection becomes more and more the focal point for online traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Caverly</title>
		<link>http://joel-mark-witt.com/blog/2009/andy-carvin-was-right-about-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3107</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Caverly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joel-mark-witt.com/blog/?p=633#comment-3107</guid>
		<description>That Andy is the ALL-KNOWING new media maven!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Andy is the ALL-KNOWING new media maven!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
